Printed . This content is updated regularly, please refer back to https://bcfsa.ca to ensure that you are relying on the most up-to-date resources.
Consent Order
Consent Order
- Licensee
- Gina Drobot, Gina Leanne Drobot
- Brokerage at Time of Sanctioned Activity
- Current Brokerage
- Royal LePage Westwin Realty, Kamloops
- Consent Order Date
- 18 August 2010
Summary
REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
In the matter of the Real Estate Services Act
S.B.C. 2004, c. 42
AND in the matter of a Disciplinary Hearing held pursuant to Section 41 of the Real Estate Services Act
Hearing Date: July 6 and 7, 2010
Decision of Council: August 18, 2010
Issue: Gina Leanne Drobot, currently unlicensed, while licensed as a representative with Westwin Realty Ltd. dba Royal LePage Westwin Realty, Kamloops, was found by a Discipline Hearing Committee to have committed professional misconduct within the meaning of section 35(1) of the Real Estate Services Act in that she:
- contravened section 35(1)(c) of the Real Estate Services Act in that she committed an act of deceptive dealing by creating a May 30, 2007 amendment form which indicated that the buyers and the seller had agreed to a modified sale price of $405,000.00 plus GST when she knew or ought to have known that the buyers did not agree to that sum but had agreed to a total sale price of $420,522.00 inclusive of net GST as set out in the contract;
- contravened section 35(1)(c) of the Real Estate Services Act in that she committed an act of deceptive dealing when she purported to witness the buyers ' signatures on the Contract Amendment Form when she did not see them or either of them sign the form and when she knew or ought to have known that the buyers had not signed the form;
- contravened section 35(1)(c) of the Real Estate Services Act and committed an act of deceptive dealing when she purported to witness the buyers ' signatures on the May 30, 2007 deficiency checklist addendum when she did not see them or either of them sign the addendum and when she knew or ought to have known that the buyers had not signed the deficiency checklist addendum; and
- contravened section 35(1)(d) of the Real Estate Services Act and demonstrated incompetence and contravened section 3-3(1)(c) and 3-4 of the Council Rules in that she failed to ensure that the sale price of $405,000.00 plus GST had been clearly set out in the contract.